Authors & Reviewers

The people behind
Skin Candid’s standards.

Skin Candid separates authorship, editorial review, practical skincare review and medical review so readers can understand who was responsible for each part of the work.

A person is credited on a page only after they genuinely complete the relevant writing or review.

How credits work

A name is a record of completed work—not decoration.

Internal planning may suggest authors or reviewers, but those suggestions are not publication claims. Public credits are added only after the person has actually written, reviewed or approved the relevant page.

Reviewer roles are kept separate because medical accuracy, practical skincare guidance and editorial quality require different responsibilities.

Editorial team

Different responsibilities. Clear boundaries.

The profiles below describe each person’s intended editorial scope. Individual page credits depend on the work completed for that page.

Merve Akkaya

Lead Practical Skincare Reviewer

Merve leads Skin Candid’s practical skincare-review framework. Her scope includes product use, routine integration, tolerability, application and realistic day-to-day skincare guidance.

She does not replace medical review for diagnosis, contraindications, treatment claims or clinical safety decisions.

Dilek Ergül

Supporting Practical Skincare Reviewer

Dilek contributes practical skincare insight under Merve Akkaya’s lead framework. Her scope includes routine usability, product application, tolerability and reader-friendly practical guidance.

She does not perform medical review and does not override the lead practical reviewer.

Dr. Abdurrahman Efem

Medical Reviewer

Dr. Efem’s review scope includes clinical accuracy, contraindications, treatment claims, safety boundaries, red flags and guidance on when professional assessment may be appropriate.

Medical review is credited only when he genuinely completes the review for the relevant page.

Skin Candid Editorial Team

Research, writing and editorial review

The editorial team manages research assignments, page structure, sourcing, disclosures, internal linking, corrections and publication-readiness checks.

Team authorship does not replace specialist review when a topic requires it.

Role hierarchy

Practical skincare review has a defined lead structure.

Lead Practical Skincare Reviewer

Sets and approves practical-review standards and oversees supporting practical reviewers.

Supporting Practical Reviewer

Contributes under the lead reviewer’s framework and does not represent equal lead authority.

Medical Reviewer

Operates independently within clinical and safety scope. Medical authority is not interchangeable with practical-review authority.

Editorial Reviewer

Checks structure, sourcing, clarity, conflicts, disclosures and whether the page meets publication standards.

What readers will see on articles

Relevant pages may display a visible editorial record.

Possible page credits

  • Written by
  • Editorially reviewed by
  • Practically reviewed by
  • Medically reviewed by
  • Last reviewed date
  • Next scheduled review

Credits do not imply

  • Personal medical advice
  • A diagnosis or treatment relationship
  • Universal product suitability
  • Guaranteed outcomes
  • Approval of unrelated claims on the site
  • Permanent validity without future review

Credentials and identity

Professional information must be represented accurately.

Role accuracy

Public role descriptions must remain within the person’s actual professional and editorial scope.

Verification status

Credentials are not described as verified until the relevant verification process is complete.

Conflict disclosure

Relevant commercial, professional or personal relationships should be disclosed when they may affect interpretation.

Contribution history

Individual profile pages may list published work only after the person’s actual contribution is recorded.

Corrections and questions

Questions about authorship or reviewer credits are welcome.

Readers may contact Skin Candid if a credit appears unclear, inaccurate or inconsistent with the role described.